Movie Review: GI Joe Retaliation

gi-joe-retaliation-review

Review by Jordan Hunt for CaryCitizen.

Cary, NC – Before I delve into my actual review of G.I. Joe: Retaliation, I feel as though I should come clean about something. I am a huge fan of both Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson and Bruce Willis.

HUGE.

The “Rock” Next Great Action Star

Even though he’s been on screen for over 10 years, it feels like only now that Johnson is finally living up to the promise as our next great action star.

He’s had some questionable choices in those years, but no matter the quality of the movie, Johnson has always proved himself capable. I mean, the man just oozes charisma. His addition to the action sequel Fast Five almost single-handedly drove that film to record grosses and proved once and for all that he is a bonafide action star.

And of course, Bruce Willis is amazing mainly because he is Bruce Willis.

Plenty of Action, But…

So you can imagine my grave disappointment when I found out that G.I. Joe: Retaliation simply fails to deliver even one truly exciting action sequence.

Now don’t get me wrong, there is plenty of action in this movie. But none of it is particularly compelling. In fact, in terms of huge blockbuster filmmaking, Retaliation feels fairly small.

An action blockbuster like this should have spectacle to spare, with a fast pace that doesn’t allow the audience to even once think about logic but just enjoy the explosions. But Retaliation only delivers decently shot action sequences that we’ve seen a million times before and usually done quite a bit better.

Under-Used Cast

The biggest letdown has got to be the complete waste of a potentially awesome action filled cast. As I mentioned previously, the film stars Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson and Bruce Willis as well as Channing Tatum. Tatum, who had a big year in 2012 with hits like Magic Mike, The Vow and 21 Jump Street, also starred in this films predecessor G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra and is actually one of the only cast members of that film to return for the sequel. Unfortunately, he only pops up for about 15 minutes, which is a real shame because he has really become confident as an actor and could have added a big dose of fun to the proceedings.

Oh, and Bruce Willis only has about 5 minutes of screen time. You get one of the biggest action stars of all time and then barely use him? How dare you!

The only real bright spot of the film for me was The Rock himself. What can I say? The man is just fun to watch onscreen. He knows exactly what kind of movie he is in and puts his all into every action sequence and cheesy one-liners. It’s just a shame the filmmakers couldn’t match his enthusiasm.

Not Worth The Price of Admission

If you’re a dad looking for something to watch with your teenage son or vice versa and you have the absolute worst urge to see some action on the big screen, you could do worse than G.I. Joe: Retaliation. You could do a lot better too, though. I say stay home and put something like Die Hard or Fast Five on and get your dose of quality action flicks that way.

First time commenter? Please read our Comments Policy. Comments are at the discretion of the Publisher.


1 reply
  1. Jon
    Jon says:

    This movie was crap! They killed off Duke before the movie even gets going!? DUKE IS G.I. Joe!! You can’t have a GI joe without duke. Yes Rock is finally living up to the expectations of the action hero he could become, but so is Tatum.. And you cut him?! Garbage. And as far as Bruce Willis goes? Who cares! He is over the hill and made the movie more of a comic relief versus adding to the action of the movie. The first Joe was way better and Retaliation doesn’t live up to the hype of a good sequel at all.

Comments are closed.